From Gattaca to Minority Report, films have taught us to see digital IDs as sinister. As the UK government prepares to roll out its own version, the real challenge isn’t the technology, it’s the story people choose to believe.
In the films, a digital ID usually means you’re in trouble. In Gattaca, it tells you your DNA isn’t good enough. In Minority Report, shop walls shout your name while you’re just trying to buy a pair of socks. In Blade Runner 2049, identity checks decide whether you’re human or something less. Even in lighter stuff like Black Mirror, the idea of an all-encompassing identity system usually spirals into social scoring and surveillance. On screen, digital IDs are almost always a bad sign.
Now, the UK government’s version couldn’t sound more ordinary. A digital wallet on your phone, linked to the gov.uk app. Not to decide your destiny. Not to predict crimes. Just to prove your right to work. No more photocopying passports. No more digging out old gas bills.
But here’s the communications problem: Hollywood has already written the story. And when people hear “digital ID,” they don’t picture someone getting a job without dragging a battered folder of paperwork into HR. They picture Tom Cruise running from drones, or a faceless bureaucrat scanning their DNA.
That challenge is amplified by the way people now consume information. Social media is no longer a shared public square, it’s a collection of echo chambers of interest-driven silos. People see what they’re primed to believe. If you’re suspicious of government, your feed serves up stories about surveillance and slippery slopes. If you’re optimistic about tech, you see promises of efficiency and security. Each camp becomes more entrenched.
This is why communication around digital ID is such a minefield. On the one hand, the practical benefits are clear: less bureaucracy, faster checks, fewer opportunities for fraud. On the other, the cultural baggage is huge, decades of films, TV shows, and dystopian novels telling us that IDs are about control, not convenience.
And government isn’t starting from a position of trust. Public confidence in official messaging has taken a hit over the past decade. For many, it doesn’t matter how many times a minister says, “This isn’t surveillance.” What matters is the narrative people already believe, reinforced daily by their own curated media streams.
So the real question isn’t whether digital ID works, technically, it probably will. The question is whether people accept it. That won’t be decided in Whitehall, or even on the gov.uk app. It’ll be decided in the stories people choose to share, the cultural references they fall back on, and the media ecosystems they live inside.
Which means that for communicators, the hard part isn’t designing the system. It’s rewriting the story.
Leave a Reply